Always!

Nov 15, 2011,02:53 AM
 


Coaxial, or not?

Without pusher? Even if it is not belonging to the Monopusher category, there is one to mention...

Here we go...

1/ Coaxial ( I mean, with the pusher integrated in the crown ).

IMO, the most interesting category, as it is the purest, the cleanest solution.

- UN:

IMO again, mechanically, mosre interestnig than the Roger Dubuis competitor, with its Jacquet movement reworked by a certain François Paul Journe.

We can even say that it is one of the very rare Chrono from FPJ which works, so it is a collector in itself. smile



It existed in colored gold or white gold, silver or black dial ( only on the colored gold, for the black dial ).

A must have, i my book.



( Sorry, don't know who to credit for this movement picture ).

- Roger Dubuis: Exquisite, for sure, I think that Radone will tell us a lot of things about this one.

- Longines:

Known for their excellent Chronos, I would also add that these are certainly among the finest in the world, ever made, if not THE finest.

Top movements, superb dials, great cases.

The monopusher is just ... Exquisite. ( Pic found on the net, sorry I don't remember who to credit for )



- Cartier and its famous Tortue from the Collection Privée Cartier Paris is sublime. My favourite is the one with the Arab 6 and 12 on the dial.

- Patek, of course, but I find it a tad too small ( 2 more millimeters would have been perfect, fpor my taste ), and well, how to say it, a tad too expensive for my not that deep pockets? A brilliant watch, nonetheless.

- GP, with the 375 MM, much nicer in the real than on picture:



- One of my absolute favourite is here, and it was a big surprise, a revelation, the P 10 Montblanc Chronograph:

A superb enamel dial, a great movement and a nice case, it has all to be a Purist Chronograph.





One or two millimeters less big, and it would have been even more perfect, IMO.

2/ Not coaxial monopusher:

Here again, you have a great variety in the modern and in the vintage.

- Breitling ( same than Lemania, Omega, and so on... ).

Rare, original, and with a military background ( Royal Canadian Aiforce ).



- Montblanc, once again:



- THE Champion, the Duometre from JLC:

One of the most original ( horologically speaking ), one of the nicest, and, cherry on the cake, a Foudroyante:





3/ Without pusher at all... Even crazier... The JLC Amvox II!

Here, the glass is the pusher, as this is the case which while pivoting, starts, stops and resets to zero the Chronograph.

Funny, crazy, pure and unique.



This is the only automatic chrono movement from this list...

Hope this will be of some help, Fernando. You have all my sympathy!

Best,

Nicolas


More posts: Duometre

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Monopusher chronographs.....

 
 By: fernando : November 15th, 2011-00:39
Have you ever wanted to own or is there one in your possession? Let's see some or hear your thoughts about them. They are not often discussed but it would be interesting to see some variety here or whether they fit in with your collecting criteria. I have... 

Mono-pusher Seconds

 
 By: iim7v7im7 : November 15th, 2011-02:29
Fernando, Mine has a mono-pusher, but just has chronograph seconds (no minue or hour registers), but I really enjoy it. Bob Chronoswiss Chronoscope (CH 1523 BW) Front Chronoswiss Chronoscope (CH 1523 BW) Back...  

Very interesting Bob!

 
 By: fernando : November 15th, 2011-02:50
And a real beauty! Thanks for sharing, F

Always!

 
 By: amanico : November 15th, 2011-02:53
Coaxial, or not? Without pusher? Even if it is not belonging to the Monopusher category, there is one to mention... Here we go... 1/ Coaxial ( I mean, with the pusher integrated in the crown ). IMO, the most interesting category, as it is the purest, the ...  

WOW Nicolas!

 
 By: fernando : November 15th, 2011-03:12
You really answered my call with these superb examples! The UN, the Longines and surprisingly the Montblanc gets me drooling and of course Radone's RD is also very hot. Somehow, having the pusher on the crown gets my blood boiling. Thank you so much for t... 

Thank you for mentioning my Roger Dubuis, Fernando.

 
 By: radone : November 16th, 2011-02:17
I am glad that you like it. I added a few words about it as a reply to Nicolas' post.

You forgot the "monotwister" ....

 
 By: Marcus Hanke : November 15th, 2011-04:21
... since the crown is not pushed, but twisted to operate the chronograph mechanism: HabringĀ² COS, here in its purest variant, with central chronograph minute hand: And here with conventional minute counter at 3: Regards, Marcus...  

Thanks for sharing Marcus.

 
 By: fernando : November 15th, 2011-16:40
An interesting idea!

Well: that's a surprise!

 
 By: MTF : November 15th, 2011-20:58
Thanks Marcus for sharing that. Monotwister.......who would have thought? And I had completely forgotten about it as it was buried in the past plethora of novelties that year. Regards, MTF

Thank you for evoking my monopusher, Nicolas!

 
 By: radone : November 16th, 2011-02:10
I bought it as a surrogate for the 5070 and, after buying the latter, I ended up liking and protecting it more. With its smaller diameter, it (only) seems more fragile. It has the best anti-glare treatment I have ever seen, it almost looks as if it doesn'...  

A surprise monopusher chrono

 
 By: expwmbat : November 15th, 2011-06:17
Not integral to the design, but whimsical and "just because" Paul Gerber could...the MIH monopusher chrono: With the minutes window on the back: Truly it does serve a purpose on the front as well--one can sync the central seconds and keep it running. Or i...  

Another unusual surprise!

 
 By: fernando : November 15th, 2011-16:41
Thanks Daniel.

I love this one...

 
 By: foversta : November 15th, 2011-11:18
Fx...  

I can see why FX.

 
 By: fernando : November 15th, 2011-16:42
Thanks for another fabulous WS.

Not too special....

 
 By: SteveW : November 16th, 2011-08:19
...but still works after, what 60, 70 years? Used whenever I barbeque. Oh, I forgot this one:...  

Thanks for sharing these Steve.

 
 By: fernando : November 16th, 2011-18:56
They are more special than you think, especially when they are still serving a very useful function!

Blancpain Villeret Monopussoir...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : November 16th, 2011-10:14
is a particularly well-designed watch. It's based upon the Piguet/Blancpain Cal. 1185, modified to monopusher control (note the simplified column wheel with only 4 columns): It comes in steel: red gold with opaline dial... ... red gold with havana brown d...  

Another fine example Magnus!

 
 By: fernando : November 16th, 2011-19:02
Excellent pics. to compliment this beautiful piece. Thanks fernando

An unusual but interesting idea...

 
 By: fernando : November 16th, 2011-19:07
to do without the pusher. Quite baffling to the uninitiated. Hope to experience it one day. Lovely pics. & watch! Thank you. F

It also has a very smooth operation...

 
 By: Ornatus-Mundi : November 16th, 2011-23:44
completely negating the notion that column wheel operated chronos are inherently preferable on these grounds! Cheers, Magnus

Sorry to be late

 
 By: Geo : November 18th, 2011-10:01
As most of you know, I have two that have been posted some time ago. here they a reg again, together. Both have the same 045MC THB ebauche movement and I actually like these watches so much because of their close similarity to their vintage counter parts....  

They are exquisite!

 
 By: fernando : November 18th, 2011-17:24
Just what this thread needed. Thanks for posting Geo! F