A very exciting, and unpredictable contest..No exagerration to say it was nerve wrecking.

Sep 28, 2009,02:10 AM
 

To have an idea of how hard Massi and SJX had to work, one can first imagine the ground rule:

ALL watchesand time works made between Sep 2008 to 2009 that were presented to the public as complete, were sampled and judged.

From Casios and Seikos...to Pateks and Langes and Greubels...even the Atmos clock..

Yes, some fantastic machines may have been "missed", but that was also a parameter...as to how well the product "penetrated the field of awareness" of the jury.

To assemble a jury of a caliber of knowledge and purchasing power that we wanted to sample...ie..a jury very much that would belong in the forms of thePuristS...or higher.

The jurors came from people who were in the Forbes 500, retired CEOs, museum curators...all non industry, non press and with a minimum of experience settled by the steering comittee to balance a certain sample cut of the market.

To even GET responses from these men and women, who are incredibly busy people, who would normally not return a phone call, excpet by a secretary, not to mention that they would not have time to read/post here on the purists..except for 1..

This is the first time the scope was so challenging and wide.

Last year, we had to judge from the preselected geneva watches. This year, the contest had NO EXCLUSIONS...everyone was "judged..no winners by default".

Although not "perfect", with the constrainst of mainly TIME...it was VERY time consuming...and budget...and working for NO monetery gains...it was a great job by SJX (Chairman of the Jury) and Massi ( protocols and procedures Chairman)...incredible!!!

We learnt a lot, and for what it is worth...to get into the list of the TOP 7 for any watch, was a win.

Omega Ploprof was my favorite...and altho it did not win a first prize, it appeared in several top 7 categories.

Even the Seiko!

Looking thru the list, and later how the finalists of over 300 watches ....it is a well of information for marketing studies.

 


More posts: PloprofSeamaster

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Presenting the winners of the GRAND PRIX D’HORLOGERIE ASIA 2009

 
 By: SJX : September 28th, 2009-01:39
On Friday last week, the Grand Prix d'Horlogerie Asia 2009, organised by Edipresse who also bring us the Grand Prix d'Horlogerie de Geneve, culminated with a gala dinner during which the winners of the contest were presented. They are: Watch of the Year: ...  

Pre-event press release

 
 By: SJX : September 28th, 2009-01:42
G RAND P RIX D ’H ORLOGERIE A SIA 2009 A SIA ’ S T OP W ATCH C OLLECTORS T O J UDGE A SIA ’ S T OP W ATCH C OMPETITION Singapore, 25 August 2008: Edipresse Singapore, the publishers of Singapore Tatler , GMT XXL, Singapore Tatler Homes, ... 

A very exciting, and unpredictable contest..No exagerration to say it was nerve wrecking.

 
 By: bernard cheong : September 28th, 2009-02:10
To have an idea of how hard Massi and SJX had to work, one can first imagine the ground rule: ALL watchesand time works made between Sep 2008 to 2009 that were presented to the public as complete, were sampled and judged. From Casios and Seikos...to Patek... 

Is it humanly possible

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : September 28th, 2009-04:34
to be higher than Purist!!!??? :0))) Great effort of our dear SJX Kudos Seems that Lange is going strong in Asian market Looking forward more pictures of event Best Damian

Credit where credit is due

 
 By: SJX : September 28th, 2009-06:58
Without Bernard Cheong, Massimiliano Landi and of course Gilbert Cheah who is managing director of Edipresse Singapore, the Grand Prix d'Horlogerie would not have occurred at all. They, along with the nominating committee and jury, deserve high praise for... 

Logistics, logistics, and more logistics...

 
 By: patrick_y : September 28th, 2009-09:39
The logistics of setting up a judging panel such as this one is very difficult and to educate all the non-partial judges about the candidate watches is something that is supremely difficult. From what you've stated regarding the judges are not from the wa... 

You hit the nail on the head

 
 By: SJX : September 28th, 2009-09:45
Logistics were tough. That being said, most of the judges required very little education, in fact almost none at all, given their knowledge. For example, the watches owned by some of the members of the nominating committee and jury range from various MB&a... 

Daunting task indeed!

 
 By: Z3 : September 30th, 2009-13:06
Especially getting everybody familiarized with the rules and protocols. Thanks JX. Can't wait to hear the winners. Jon

Thanks SJX.......

 
 By: CL : September 28th, 2009-07:04
and Super Congratulation to Lange and Urwerk *CL

Thanks for the post -- so busy! (nt)

 
 By: MTF : September 28th, 2009-13:39
This message has been edited by MTF on 2009-09-28 13:59:06

Thanks SJX - I would agree with most of the winning choices...

 
 By: 219 : September 28th, 2009-15:24
Although the sports (especially) and design are a little puzzling to my mind. I would have also voted for the RM018 in the Jewelry section, but then, thats me! Thanks again Andrew H

Great achievement, congrats

 
 By: allegro : September 29th, 2009-00:34
I guess, there will always be an insatiable need to make award and prices. It is fun and interesting to observe what is regarded as the best of the best in the Asian part of the world, and I am sure it must have have cost a good deal of hard work. As for ... 

Thanks for sharing JX... nt

 
 By: Rob : September 30th, 2009-22:40
nt